Ukraine – Livestock and Products Annual Report 2011Saturday, October 15, 2011
Production of beef will continue to fall in Ukraine. Veal and meat from dairy cows will constitute the vast majority of production, according to the USDA Foreign Agricultural Service.
The twenty years long downward trend in beef production is a result of general inefficiency of the dairy sector with overwhelming majority of animals on household plots. Some investments will continue into dairy enterprises due to extremely attractive milk prices, but high risks and long return period for such investments keep them to a minimum. It is unclear whether or not these investments would result in a significant beef production increase in a longer run. Similar to pork, exports of beef will remain limited mostly to neighboring Russia, where Ukraine has some trade regime and supply distance advantage.
The bumper crop of feed grains expected in 2011 will help Ukrainian livestock producers keep their costs low. It is expected that this year’s crop will be similar to historical maximums achieved in 1990 and 2008. Corn, wheat and barley prices in 2011 will be lower due to current grain trade policy, and will help swine producers to maintain profitable operations from 2011 into early 2012, though they will not be a major factor due to general inefficiency of the industry.
As it will be outlined in the Consumption section, the shift in consumer preferences toward cheaper poultry meat depressed production of both beef and pork in the country throughout the last two decades. Year to year shifts are hardly noticeable, but 2000-2010 country meat production change is striking.
Ukraine's production of beef continues to decline with no sign of recovery. This production remains a derivative of the dairy industry and is highly dependent on milk price. Despite record-high milk prices in 2011 the livestock herd size is expected to continue to decline in both 2011 and 2012. Beef animals constitute a negligible portion of the Ukrainian livestock herd. Their number will continue to decrease along with dairy and dual-purpose animals.
Ukrainian households will continue to be the major producers of beef in near future. In mid-2011, households accounted for 70 per cent (growing by one per cent from 2009) of all cattle and 78 per cent of dairy cows in Ukraine. Backyard production practices remain inefficient with very little attention paid to feeding rations and animal health issues. Households view livestock husbandry as important part of the social “safety net” and pay less attention to profitability of a cow. Even existing genetic potential is not fully utilized. Efficiency of industrial farms is also predominately low. Many industrial farms follow outdated livestock management and feeding practices inherited from old collective farms.
High milk prices observed on the market in last year or two ignited some interest from investors. The flow of money into the dairy enterprise remains to be small. Businesses continue to target the poultry and swine sectors because of higher and faster rates of return. No large scale investments into beef production were made in recent decade. Lower beef prices in comparison to pork have also driven investments elsewhere.
Cattle, cow and swine inventories for 2010 were changed in the PSD table to reflect official changes in the Ukrainian State Statistics Committee year-end statistics. Production (pig crop and calf crop) levels have been changed to match the GOU revisions. Beef import figures for the PSD were converted into CWE.
Slow economic recovery and continued crisis aftershocks will not allow major growth in disposable income in 2011/12. Ukrainian consumers remain highly price cautious especially in lower income small towns and rural areas. According to industry sources in 2005 shares of animal proteins in average Ukrainian diet were distributed as follows: 30 per cent of veal and beef, 32 per cent pork, and 36 per cent poultry. In 2009 the share of poultry grew to 44 per cent and in 2010 to 50 per cent. Per capita poultry consumption in Ukraine (including housed production and consumption) in 2010 reached average EU level of 23.5 kilograms. Further growth of poultry consumption is possible mostly as substitution for more expensive pork and beef. Steadily falling beef production and slow pork industry development create additional incentives for poultry industry growth. The gap between poultry and red meat is expected to widen in 2011/12.
Prices have also had a significant impact on consumption patterns especially among less affluent consumers. In traditional Ukrainian consumption pattern shares of beef and pork dominated. Over the last decade the number of cattle was on decline while price of beef was on steady slow growth. Although in 2011 price of beef almost reached the price of pork, the beef/pork price ratio in Ukraine remains to be very unusual with higher pork price. Further slow beef price growth seems inevitable. In turn this will negatively impact beef consumption, as consumers got used to cheaper beef in last two decades.
The majority of Ukrainians are not ready to pay a premium price for beef derived from beef cattle, although such product is available in few upper segment restaurants in major urban centers. This market segment can grow significantly over time as more consumers get attracted to the taste of premium product. Attempts to sell chilled locally produced beef made by Ukrainian companies had mixed success due to inferior beef quality far short of premium segment it was positioned into.
Import of beef and pork to Ukraine are subject to actions that can reduce trade, via two institutions: Ukraine’s Custom Service (CS) and the State Veterinary and Phytosanitary Service of Ukraine (SVPS). Importers say that the Customs Service assigns a higher import value for imported meat products which results in increased import duty and Value Added Taxes. In turn the SVPS qualitatively limited imports using permit procedures. Due to unclear and controversial legislation the SVPS demanded import permits for all imported products of animal origin including meat. In many cases importers were denied import permits because of technicalities or errors in application. In some cases import permits were delayed, so importers suffered additional losses.
In April 2011 Ukraine introduced import licensing for poultry and lard (HS 0207 and 0209). According to the GOU’s WTO obligation Ukraine can introduce only automatic import licensing which does not establish a trade barrier. Licensing cost is approximately USD 100.
Due to significant domestic production of red meat and consumer adherence to fresh/chilled products, imported meat is used mainly for industrial processing into sausages, ham, frozen semi-finished and smoked meat products. Imports of premium quality beef will remain insignificant although in a longer term perspective this market can become interesting for US exporters.
The market for pork (mostly trimmings) is rather big, but import restrictions combined with growing domestic production leave little hope for future trade growth. US share on Ukraine’s pork market is not very significant while competition with Brazilian, German and Polish products is fierce.
The Russian Federation will be the major destination for Ukraine’s exports in 2011. The amount of trade in 2012 will remain to be subject to political bilateral negotiations between two countries. Ukraine and Russia have an FTA that keeps Ukrainian beef and pork outside of Russian import quotas. None of the competitors has similar competitive advantages. Although Russia’s active import restriction policies and heavy subsidies to own production do not allow Ukrainian industry to consider Russia as reliable long-term export destination. Russia is likely to continue trade restrictions through veterinary and sanitary measures in 2011/12.
On 15 July 2011, Russian Veterinary Authority Rosselkhoznadzor announced results of the system audit of Ukrainian meat and dairy producers delisting 28 companies (six of them temporarily). This inspection conducted by Rosselkhoznadzor was officially positioned as Custom Union (CU) inspection, so trade restriction would cover other CU members - namely Belorussia and Kazakhstan. Now only 4 beef producers (15 delisted) and 3 pork producers can export to Russia and the CU.
Ukrainian meatpackers ship to Russian markets despite obvious unsatisfied domestic demand in pork due to significant market price difference. Shortage in the Ukrainian market are covered by imported products creating a situation when Ukraine serves as an importer and an exporter of pork at the same time. Exports to Russia are viewed as low risk operation since all rejected shipments can be sold on domestic market. Some Ukrainian exporters test the market for offal in China, Mongolia, and Viet Nam, and ready-to-eat products in Moldova. Shipments to these countries are not expected to be big.
Export perspectives for EU remain bleak despite massive investments into food safety conducted by selected Ukrainian meatpackers in 2008-11. Many pork and beef producers failed DG SANCO inspections in 2009-10. Only few vertically integrated holding continued facility improvements in hope to get market access. Beside sanitary reasons, there are major problems with quotas that EU is ready to offer as a part of future FTA. According to GOU the negotiation process slowed down due to major disagreements on agricultural issues including meat import quotas. The "Meat Business" magazine published the unofficial positions that show ambitious export plans for Ukrainian producers. Ukraine would like to get a 24,000 ton zero duty export quota for beef and a 30,000 ton quota for pork. EU is ready to offer only 6,000 and 15,000 tons respectively with some future expansion possibility. According to Ukrainian officials, EU explained its position by inability of Ukrainian producers to fulfill requested quotas.
Trade estimates for 2010 were revised to converge with official statistics. The trade forecast for the remaining months of 2011, as well as for 2012 remains subject to trade policy changes and possible new TBT introductions.
|-||You can view the full report by clicking here.|